Name

Message

[quote=Aphrodite11]           Isn't marriage a man made institution to stroke the human ego? Because us humans have an ego and they want to own the person they are with, they want that person to belong only to them. That ego creates issues if we share the partner. We are raised to have this in personalities. But we aren't exactly monogamous now, are we? We still get wet and hard when we see other humans while having a serious relationship.            Everything and anything is possible in LOA. So what is the harm we imagine everyone happy? If we imagine that the person with whom the married target is, is happy and perfectly fine with the dissolution of the marriage? If we imagine that the dissolution has taken place with peace (without custody battles, false accusations, etc)? Does it seem that impossible? Let's take the freedom of India for example. Now I am not a patriot. But India was the only country in the world to win it's freedom without a war and if I am not wrong then Mountbatten was the last viceroy after the independence. It's not a joke to win the independence of an entire nation without a war. Nothing is impossible. If this can happen then why can't a new relationship begin without a heartbreak?           We aren't suppose to cause hurt and pain to other people using LOA. Then why imagine the traditional situation when a relationship has to be started with someone who is already with another human? What is wrong if we visualise everyone happy with the changes? We aren't visualising anyone hurt and upset.             Anyhow, I think this thread was purposefully started to make someone who manifested a married person look very bad. Perhaps Indigo couldn't tolerate that nobody opposed PeachCheeks for manifesting a married person. I think she started this thread on purpose to make PeachCheeks look bad and/or to make others think that they are bad , horrible people for cheering her knowing her target was married and/or to simply cause a conflict here. Perhaps she was mocking everyone for cheering her. Are we going to keep fighting? And anyhow, I don't see anything wrong with staying away from a sexually abusive partner and keeping kids away from her. Good for the man and good for the little child. PechCheeks and her man had the guts to go against the traditional factors and save and protect the child. The courage these had is something most people don't have. It's very uncommon. It's nearly impossible to prove that a woman can be sexually abusive let alone save a child from her claws.             Even though I am glad that this question was raised, are we going to fight knowing this thread was started by someone who thinks saving, rescuing an innocent little child from a malignant, sick minded, disgusting, sexual offender just because they are biologically connected? We can deal with this without a fight.             Any jackass and jenyass can give birth. It's raising a child right that matters a lot more. A person who raises a child with all the love, respect a child deserves is a lot more superior than someone who gives a birth. And who in the right state of mind will want to have a family with someone who sexually assaults a little child? And more than that, who in the right mind thinks that it is completely okay to keep a child with a crackhead or a sexual assaulter just because the pedophile gave birth? So let's stop fighting.[/quote]