Missy wrote:

Is calling them really nessesary? I somehow lose their image and realnes after calling them..It is more vivid and intense when I just imagine scene with them..I can clearly hear them what I want them to tell me and feeling of their touch is more intense to me that way, without calling them and seeing them turning around.
  

  
  
Are you doing the meditation from the book and/or using Lanie's guided meditation?
Have you been doing it long enough that you feel comfortable making changes?
Are you getting the desired result?  If so, then I would say to continue as you are.  
If not, revert to doing the meditation exactly as Lanie has instructed.  I have made
small changes to my meditation and it has not negated the desired outcome.
I apologize if you find my last sentence to be grammatically incorrect
  
  

 

unicornsnrainbows wrote:

Missy wrote:

Is calling them really nessesary? I somehow lose their image and realnes after calling them..It is more vivid and intense when I just imagine scene with them..I can clearly hear them what I want them to tell me and feeling of their touch is more intense to me that way, without calling them and seeing them turning around.

Missy, I'm the same way.  I find that trying to see him at a distance and calling out to him is distracting, and it's so much harder for me to actually see his face that way.  But, if I just imagine him with me, right in front of me, it's much clearer and more real to me.  Also, for some reason visualizing comes to me much easier when I'm moving...whether it be on a walk or driving in a car, everything is so much clearer and the emotions come almost unprompted.  I still try to do it Lanie's/Neville's way sometimes, but it doesn't seem as effective for me, personally.

Part with moveing is exactly the same with me. I also do it much better with my eyes open.  You and I are the same type, :D

Missy wrote:

Np
I'm taking about Lanie's instructions in a book.
I do see results without calling them also. I don't call him from distance, I just see myself with him imidiatelly and hear him say "we are connected mentally,emotionally and sexually" and then go on with visualisation.
 
 

  
  
Well then, as Confucius says - If it ain't broke, don't fix it.  

Keep on doing what you're doing.
  
  

 

Missy wrote:

I think we should keep doing it that way. I am for example daydreamer, I naturally visualised unknowingly  most time of day paralel with doing other activities. Someone who is not work better with meditations.. 
 
 

  
  
Lanie specifically mentions daydreaming in PW.

It is not the same as visualizing in the meditative state.
  
  

 

Indigo wrote:

Missy wrote:

I think we should keep doing it that way. I am for example daydreamer, I naturally visualised unknowingly  most time of day paralel with doing other activities. Someone who is not work better with meditations.. 
 
 

  
  
Lanie specifically mentions daydreaming in PW.

It is not the same as visualizing in the meditative state.
  
  

 

I understand that. My intentional creation is different than daydreamng. I just say it is easier for me to switch in that state with eyes open and get to scene in my mind imidiatelly. I don't call and see him comeing, but I just at beggining ask him "Are you here?" and he says "Yes I am" or I ask him to tell my what time it is, then he checks his phone and tells my actual real  time..that way I get that here and now feeling..
 

Last edited by Missy (2/26/2017 2:19 pm)